设为首页 加入收藏

TOP

PARAPLATIN(carboplatin)
2014-01-07 01:12:17 来源: 作者: 【 】 浏览:457次 评论:0
PARAPLATIN®
(carboplatin) for Injection, USP

 

 

WARNING

PARAPLATIN (carboplatin) for Injection, USP should be administered under the supervision of a qualified physician experienced in the use of cancer chemotherapeutic agents. Appropriate management of therapy and complications is possible only when adequate treatment facilities are readily available.

Bone marrow suppression is dose related and may be severe, resulting in infection and/or bleeding. Anemia may be cumulative and may require transfusion support. Vomiting is another frequent drug-related side effect.

Anaphylactic-like reactions to PARAPLATIN have been reported and may occur within minutes of PARAPLATIN administration. Epinephrine, corticosteroids, and antihistamines have been employed to alleviate symptoms.

 

DESCRIPTION

PARAPLATIN® (carboplatin) for Injection, USP is supplied as a sterile, lyophilized white powder available in single-dose vials containing 50 mg, 150 mg, and 450 mg of carboplatin for administration by intravenous infusion. Each vial contains equal parts by weight of carboplatin and mannitol.

Carboplatin is a platinum coordination compound that is used as a cancer chemotherapeutic agent. The chemical name for carboplatin is platinum, diammine[1,1-cyclobutanedicarboxylato(2-)-O,O′]-, (SP-4-2), and has the following structural formula:

carboplatin chemical structure

Carboplatin is a crystalline powder with the molecular formula of C6H12N2O4Pt and a molecular weight of 371.25. It is soluble in water at a rate of approximately 14 mg/mL, and the pH of a 1% solution is 5 to 7. It is virtually insoluble in ethanol, acetone, and dimethylacetamide.

 

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY

Carboplatin, like cisplatin, produces predominantly interstrand DNA cross-links rather than DNA-protein cross-links. This effect is apparently cell-cycle nonspecific. The aquation of carboplatin, which is thought to produce the active species, occurs at a slower rate than in the case of cisplatin. Despite this difference, it appears that both carboplatin and cisplatin induce equal numbers of drug-DNA cross-links, causing equivalent lesions and biological effects. The differences in potencies for carboplatin and cisplatin appear to be directly related to the difference in aquation rates.

In patients with creatinine clearances of about 60 mL/min or greater, plasma levels of intact carboplatin decay in a biphasic manner after a 30-minute intravenous infusion of 300 mg/m2 to 500 mg/m2 of PARAPLATIN. The initial plasma half-life (alpha) was found to be 1.1 to 2 hours (n=6), and the postdistribution plasma half-life (beta) was found to be 2.6 to 5.9 hours (n=6). The total body clearance, apparent volume of distribution and mean residence time for carboplatin are 4.4 L/hour, 16 L and 3.5 hours, respectively. The Cmax values and areas under the plasma concentration versus time curves from 0 to infinity (AUC inf) increase linearly with dose, although the increase was slightly more than dose proportional. Carboplatin, therefore, exhibits linear pharmacokinetics over the dosing range studied (300 mg/m2 - 500 mg/m2).

Carboplatin is not bound to plasma proteins. No significant quantities of protein-free, ultrafilterable platinum-containing species other than carboplatin are present in plasma. However, platinum from carboplatin becomes irreversibly bound to plasma proteins and is slowly eliminated with a minimum half-life of 5 days.

The major route of elimination of carboplatin is renal excretion. Patients with creatinine clearances of approximately 60 mL/min or greater excrete 65% of the dose in the urine within 12 hours and 71% of the dose within 24 hours. All of the platinum in the 24-hour urine is present as carboplatin. Only 3% to 5% of the administered platinum is excreted in the urine between 24 and 96 hours. There are insufficient data to determine whether biliary excretion occurs.

In patients with creatinine clearances below 60 mL/min the total body and renal clearances of carboplatin decrease as the creatinine clearance decreases. PARAPLATIN dosages should, therefore, be reduced in these patients (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION).

The primary determinant of PARAPLATIN clearance is glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and this parameter of renal function is often decreased in elderly patients. Dosing formulas incorporating estimates of GFR (see DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION) to provide predictable PARAPLATIN plasma AUCs should be used in elderly patients to minimize the risk of toxicity.

 

CLINICAL STUDIES

 

Use with Cyclophosphamide for Initial Treatment of Ovarian Cancer

In two prospectively randomized, controlled studies conducted by the National Cancer Institute of Canada, Clinical Trials Group (NCIC), and the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG), 789 chemotherapy naive patients with advanced ovarian cancer were treated with PARAPLATIN or cisplatin, both in combination with cyclophosphamide every 28 days for six courses before surgical reeva luation. The following results were obtained from both studies:

 

Comparative Efficacy

Overview of Pivotal Trials
  NCIC SWOG
Number of patients randomized 447 342
Median age (years) 60 62
Dose of cisplatin 75 mg/m2 100 mg/m2
Dose of carboplatin 300 mg/m2 300 mg/m2
Dose of CYTOXAN® 600 mg/m2 600 mg/m2
Residual tumor <2 cm (number of patients) 39% (174/447) 14% (49/342)
Clinical Response in Measurable Disease Patients
  NCIC SWOG
Carboplatin (number of patients) 60% (48/80) 58% (48/83)
Cisplatin (number of patients) 58% (49/85) 43% (33/76)
95% CI of difference (Carboplatin-Cisplatin) (−13.9%, 18.6%) (−2.3%, 31.1%)
Pathologic Complete Response*
  NCIC SWOG
* 114 PARAPLATIN and 109 Cisplatin patients did not undergo second look surgery in NCIC study.
   90 PARAPLATIN and 106 Cisplatin patients did not undergo second look surgery in SWOG study.
Carboplatin (number of patients) 11% (24/224) 10% (17/171)
Cisplatin (number of patients) 15% (33/223) 10% (17/171)
95% CI of difference (Carboplatin-Cisplatin) (−10.7%, 2.5%) (−6.9%, 6.9%)
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
  NCIC SWOG
*   Kaplan-Meier Estimates
     Unrelated deaths occurring in the absence of progression were counted as events (progression) in this analysis.
** Analysis adjusted for factors found to be of prognostic significance were consistent with unadjusted analysis.
Median
Carboplatin 59 weeks 49 weeks
Cisplatin 61 weeks 47 weeks
2-year PFS*
Carboplatin 31% 21%
Cisplatin 31% 21%
95% CI of difference (Carboplatin-Cisplatin) (−9.3, 8.7) (−9.0, 9.4)
3-year PFS*
Carboplatin 19% 8%
Cisplatin 23% 14%
95% CI of difference (Carboplatin-Cisplatin) (−11.5, 4.5) (−14.1, 0.3)
Hazard Ratio** 1.10 1.02
95% CI (Carboplatin-Cisplatin) (0.89, 1.35) (0.81, 1.29)
Survival
  NCIC SWOG
*   Kaplan-Meier Estimates
** Analysis adjusted for factors found to be of prognostic significance were consistent with unadjusted analysis.
Median    
Carboplatin 110 weeks 86 weeks
Cisplatin 99 weeks 79 weeks
2-year Survival*
Carboplatin 51.9% 40.2%
Cisplatin 48.4% 39.0%
95% CI of difference (Carboplatin-Cisplatin) (−6.2, 13.2) (−9.8, 12.2)
3-year Survival*
Carboplatin 34.6% 18.3%
Cisplatin 33.1% 24.9%
95% CI of difference (Carboplatin-Cisplatin) (−7.7, 10.7) (−15.9, 2.7)
Hazard Ratio** 0.98 1.01
95% CI (Carboplatin-Cisplatin) (0.78, 1.23) (0.78, 1.30)

 

Comparative Toxicity

The pattern of toxicity exerted by the PARAPLATIN-containing regimen was significantly different from that of the cisplatin-containing combinations. Differences between the two studies may be explained by different cisplatin dosages and by different supportive care.

The PARAPLATIN-containing regimen induced significantly more thrombocytopenia and, in one study, significantly more leukopenia and more need for transfusional support. The cisplatin-containing regimen produced significantly more anemia in one study. However, no significant differences occurred in incidences of infections and hemorrhagic episodes.

Non-hematologic toxicities (emesis, neurotoxicity, ototoxicity, renal toxicity, hypomagnesemia, and alopecia) were significantly more frequent in the cisplatin-containing arms.

ADVERSE EXPERIENCES IN PATIENTS WITH OVARIAN CANCER NCIC STUDY
    PARAPLATIN Arm
Percent*
Cisplatin Arm
Percent*

P-Values**
*   Values are in percent of eva luable patients.
** ns=not significant, p>0.05.
+   May have been affected by cyclophosphamide dosage delivered.
Bone Marrow
Thrombocytopenia <100,000/mm3 70 29 <0.001
  <50,000/mm3 41 6 <0.001
Neutropenia <2000 cells/mm3 97 96 ns
  <1000 cells/mm3 81 79 ns
Leukopenia <4000 cells/mm3 98 97 ns
  <2000 cells/mm3 68 52 0.001
Anemia <11 g/dL 91 91 ns
  <8 g/dL 18 12 ns
Infections   14 12 ns
Bleeding   10 4 ns
Transfusions   42 31 0.018
Gastrointestinal
Nausea and vomiting   93 98 0.010
Vomiting   84 97 <0.001
Other GI side effects   50 62 0.013
Neurologic
Peripheral neuropathies   16 42 <0.001
Ototoxicity   13 33 <0.001
Other sensory side effects   6 10 ns
Central neurotoxicity   28 40 0.009
Renal
Serum creatinine elevations   5 13 0.006
Blood urea elevations   17 31 <0.001
Hepatic
Bilirubin elevations   5 3 ns
SGOT elevations   17 13 ns
Alkaline phosphatase elevations
Electrolytes loss
Sodium   10 20 0.005
Potassium   16 22 ns
Calcium   16 19 ns
Magnesium   63 88 <0.001
Other side effects
Pain   36 37 ns
Asthenia   40 33 ns
Cardiovascular   15 19 ns
Respiratory   8 9 ns
Allergic   12 9 ns
Genitourinary   10 10 ns
Alopecia +   50 62 0.017
Mucositis   10 9 ns
ADVERSE EXPERIENCES IN PATIENTS WITH OVARIAN CANCER SWOG STUDY
    PARAPLATIN Arm
Percent*
Cisplatin Arm
Percent*

P-Values**
*   Values are in percent of eva luable patients.
** ns=not significant, p >0.05.
+   May have been affected by cyclophosphamide dosage delivered.
Bone Marrow
Thrombocytopenia <100,000/mm3 59 35 <0.001
  <50,000/mm3 22 11 0.006
Neutropenia <2000 cells/mm3 95 97 ns
  <1000 cells/mm3 84 78 ns
Leukopenia <4000 cells/mm3 97 97 ns
  <2000 cells/mm3 76 67 ns
Anemia <11 g/dL 88 87 ns
  <8 g/dL 8 24 <0.001
Infections   18 21 ns
Bleeding   6 4 ns
Transfusions   25 33 ns
Gastrointestinal
Nausea and vomiting   94 96 ns
Vomiting   82 91 0.007
Other GI side effects   40 48 ns
Neurologic
Peripheral neuropathies   13 28 0.001
Ototoxicity   12 30 <0.001
Other sensory side effects   4 6 ns
Central neurotoxicity   23 29 ns
Renal
Serum creatinine elevations   7 38 <0.001
Blood urea elevations  
Hepatic
Bilirubin elevations   5 3 ns
SGOT elevations   23 16 ns
Alkaline phosphatase elevations 29 20
以下是“全球医药”详细资料
Tags: 责任编辑:admin
】【打印繁体】【投稿】【收藏】 【推荐】【举报】【评论】 【关闭】 【返回顶部
分享到QQ空间
分享到: 
上一篇DepoCyt Injection (Enzon) 下一篇VELCADE(bortezomib) for Injecti..

相关栏目

最新文章

图片主题

热门文章

推荐文章

相关文章

广告位