设为首页 加入收藏

TOP

maxipime (cefepime hydrochloride) injection, powder, for solution
2014-11-28 12:07:28 来源: 作者: 【 】 浏览:310次 评论:0

maxipime (cefepime hydrochlorideinjection, powder, for solution 
[Bristol-Myers Squibb Company]

For Intravenous or Intramuscular Use

DESCRIPTION

To reduce the development of drug-resistant bacteria and maintain the effectiveness of MAXIPIME® and other antibacterial drugs, MAXIPIME should be used only to treat or prevent infections that are proven or strongly suspected to be caused by bacteria.

MAXIPIME (cefepime hydrochloride, USP) is a semi-synthetic, broad spectrum, cephalosporin antibiotic for parenteral administration. The chemical name is 1-[[(6R,7R)-7-[2-(2-amino-4-thiazolyl)-glyoxylamido]-2-carboxy-8-oxo-5-thia-1-azabicyclo[4.2.0] oct-2-en-3-yl]methyl]-1-methylpyrrolidinium chloride, 72-(Z)- (O-methyloxime), monohydrochloride, monohydrate, which corresponds to the following structural formula:

Image from Drug Label Content

Cefepime hydrochloride is a white to pale yellow powder. Cefepime hydrochloride contains the equivalent of not less than 825 µg and not more than 911 µg of cefepime (C19H24N6O5S2) per mg, calculated on an anhydrous basis. It is highly soluble in water.

MAXIPIME for Injection is supplied for intramuscular or intravenous administration in strengths equivalent to 500 mg, 1 g, and 2 g of cefepime. (See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.) MAXIPIME is a sterile, dry mixture of cefepime hydrochloride and L-arginine. It contains the equivalent of not less than 90.0 percent and not more than 115.0 percent of the labeled amount of cefepime (C19H24N6O5S2). The L-arginine, at an approximate concentration of 725 mg/g of cefepime, is added to control the pH of the constituted solution at 4.0–6.0. Freshly constituted solutions of MAXIPIME will range in color from colorless to amber.

 

CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY

 

Pharmacokinetics

The average plasma concentrations of cefepime observed in healthy adult male volunteers (n=9) at various times following single 30-minute infusions (IV) of cefepime 500 mg, 1 g, and 2 g are summarized in Table 1. Elimination of cefepime is principally via renal excretion with an average (±SD) half-life of 2.0 (±0.3) hours and total body clearance of 120.0 (±8.0) mL/min in healthy volunteers. Cefepime pharmacokinetics are linear over the range 250 mg to 2 g. There is no evidence of accumulation in healthy adult male volunteers (n=7) receiving clinically relevant doses for a period of 9 days.

 

Absorption

The average plasma concentrations of cefepime and its derived pharmacokinetic parameters after intravenous administration are portrayed in Table 1.

Table 1: Average Plasma Concentrations in µg/mL of Cefepime and Derived Pharmacokinetic Parameters (±SD), Intravenous Administration
  MAXIPIME
Parameter 500 mg IV 1 g IV 2 g IV
0.5 h 38.2 78.7 163.1
1.0 h 21.6 44.5 85.8
2.0 h 11.6 24.3 44.8
4.0 h 5.0 10.5 19.2
8.0 h 1.4 2.4 3.9
12.0 h 0.2 0.6 1.1
Cmax, µg/mL 39.1 (3.5) 81.7 (5.1) 163.9 (25.3)
AUC, h•µg/mL 70.8 (6.7) 148.5 (15.1) 284.8 (30.6)
Number of subjects
(male)
9 9 9

Following intramuscular (IM) administration, cefepime is completely absorbed. The average plasma concentrations of cefepime at various times following a single IM injection are summarized in Table 2. The pharmacokinetics of cefepime are linear over the range of 500 mg to 2 g IM and do not vary with respect to treatment duration.

Table 2: Average Plasma Concentrations in µg/mL of Cefepime and Derived Pharmacokinetic Parameters (±SD), Intramuscular Administration
  MAXIPIME
Parameter 500 mg IM 1 g IM 2 g IM
0.5 h 8.2 14.8 36.1
1.0 h 12.5 25.9 49.9
2.0 h 12.0 26.3 51.3
4.0 h 6.9 16.0 31.5
8.0 h 1.9 4.5 8.7
12.0 h 0.7 1.4 2.3
Cmax, µg/mL 13.9 (3.4) 29.6 (4.4) 57.5 (9.5)
Tmax, h 1.4 (0.9) 1.6 (0.4) 1.5 (0.4)
AUC, h•µg/mL 60.0 (8.0) 137.0 (11.0) 262.0 (23.0)
Number of subjects
(male)
6 6 12

 

Distribution

The average steady-state volume of distribution of cefepime is 18.0 (±2.0) L. The serum protein binding of cefepime is approximately 20% and is independent of its concentration in serum.

Cefepime is excreted in human milk. A nursing infant consuming approximately 1000 mL of human milk per day would receive approximately 0.5 mg of cefepime per day. (See PRECAUTIONS: Nursing Mothers.)

Concentrations of cefepime achieved in specific tissues and body fluids are listed in Table 3.

Table 3: Average Concentrations of Cefepime in Specific Body Fluids (µg/mL) or Tissues (µg/g)
Tissue or Fluid Dose/Route # of Patients Average Time of
Sample Post-Dose (h)
Average
Concentration
Blister Fluid 2 g IV 6 1.5 81.4 µg/mL
Bronchial Mucosa 2 g IV 20 4.8 24.1 µg/g
Sputum 2 g IV 5 4.0 7.4 µg/mL
Urine 500 mg IV 8 0-4 292 µg/mL
  1 g IV 12 0-4 926 µg/mL
  2 g IV 12 0-4 3120 µg/mL
Bile 2 g IV 26 9.4 17.8 µg/mL
Peritoneal Fluid 2 g IV 19 4.4 18.3 µg/mL
Appendix 2 g IV 31 5.7 5.2 µg/g
Gallbladder 2 g IV 38 8.9 11.9 µg/g
Prostate 2 g IV 5 1.0 31.5 µg/g

Data suggest that cefepime does cross the inflamed blood-brain barrier. The clinical relevance of these data are uncertain at this time.

 

Metabolism and Excretion

Cefepime is metabolized to N-methylpyrrolidine (NMP) which is rapidly converted to the N-oxide (NMP-N-oxide). Urinary recovery of unchanged cefepime accounts for approximately 85% of the administered dose. Less than 1% of the administered dose is recovered from urine as NMP, 6.8% as NMP-N-oxide, and 2.5% as an epimer of cefepime. Because renal excretion is a significant pathway of elimination, patients with renal dysfunction and patients undergoing hemodialysis require dosage adjustment. (See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.)

 

Special Populations

 

Pediatric Patients

Cefepime pharmacokinetics have been eva luated in pediatric patients from 2 months to 11 years of age following single and multiple doses on q8h (n=29) and q12h (n=13) schedules. Following a single IV dose, total body clearance and the steady-state volume of distribution averaged 3.3 (±1.0) mL/min/kg and 0.3 (±0.1) L/kg, respectively. The urinary recovery of unchanged cefepime was 60.4 (±30.4)% of the administered dose, and the average renal clearance was 2.0 (±1.1) mL/min/kg. There were no significant effects of age or gender (25 male vs. 17 female) on total body clearance or volume of distribution, corrected for body weight. No accumulation was seen when cefepime was given at 50 mg/kg q12h (n=13), while Cmax, AUC, and t½ were increased about 15% at steady state after 50 mg/kg q8h. The exposure to cefepime following a 50 mg/kg IV dose in a pediatric patient is comparable to that in an adult treated with a 2 g IV dose. The absolute bioavailability of cefepime after an IM dose of 50 mg/kg was 82.3 (±15)% in eight patients.

 

Geriatric Patients

Cefepime pharmacokinetics have been investigated in elderly (65 years of age and older) men (n=12) and women (n=12) whose mean (SD) creatinine clearance was 74.0 (±15.0) mL/min. There appeared to be a decrease in cefepime total body clearance as a function of creatinine clearance. Therefore, dosage administration of cefepime in the elderly should be adjusted as appropriate if the patient’s creatinine clearance is 60 mL/min or less. (See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.)

 

Renal Insufficiency

Cefepime pharmacokinetics have been investigated in patients with various degrees of renal insufficiency (n=30). The average half-life in patients requiring hemodialysis was 13.5 (±2.7) hours and in patients requiring continuous peritoneal dialysis was 19.0 (±2.0) hours. Cefepime total body clearance decreased proportionally with creatinine clearance in patients with abnormal renal function, which serves as the basis for dosage adjustment recommendations in this group of patients. (See DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION.)

 

Hepatic Insufficiency

The pharmacokinetics of cefepime were unaltered in patients with impaired hepatic function who received a single 1 g dose (n=11).

 

Microbiology

Cefepime is a bactericidal agent that acts by inhibition of bacterial cell wall synthesis. Cefepime has a broad spectrum of in vitro activity that encompasses a wide range of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Cefepime has a low affinity for chromosomally-encoded beta-lactamases. Cefepime is highly resistant to hydrolysis by most beta-lactamases and exhibits rapid penetration into gram-negative bacterial cells. Within bacterial cells, the molecular targets of cefepime are the penicillin binding proteins (PBP).

Cefepime has been shown to be active against most strains of the following microorganisms, both in vitro and in clinical infections as described in the INDICATIONS AND USAGE section.

Aerobic Gram-Negative Microorganisms:
      Enterobacter
      Escherichia coli
      Klebsiella pneumoniae
      Proteus mirabilis
      Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Aerobic Gram-Positive Microorganisms:
      Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin-susceptible strains only)
      Streptococcus pneumoniae
      Streptococcus pyogenes
(Lancefield’s Group A streptococci)
      Viridans group streptococci

The following in vitro data are available, but their clinical significance is unknown. Cefepime has been shown to have in vitro activity against most strains of the following microorganisms; however, the safety and effectiveness of cefepime in treating clinical infections due to these microorganisms have not been established in adequate and well-controlled trials.

Aerobic Gram-Positive Microorganisms:
      Staphylococcus epidermidis (methicillin-susceptible strains only)
      Staphylococcus saprophyticus
      Streptococcus agalactiae
(Lancefield’s Group B streptococci)

NOTE: Most strains of enterococci, eg, Enterococcus faecalis, and methicillin-resistant staphylococci are resistant to cefepime.

Aerobic Gram-Negative Microorganisms:
      Acinetobacter calcoaceticus subsp. lwoffi
      Citrobacter diversus
      Citrobacter freundii
      Enterobacter agglomerans
      Haemophilus influenzae
(including beta-lactamase producing strains)
      Hafnia alvei
      Klebsiella oxytoca
      Moraxella catarrhalis
(including beta-lactamase producing strains)
      Morganella morganii
      Proteus vulgaris
      Providencia rettgeri
      Providencia stuartii
      Serratia marcescens

NOTE: Cefepime is inactive against many strains of Stenotrophomonas (formerly Xanthomonas maltophilia and Pseudomonas maltophilia).

Anaerobic Microorganisms:

NOTE: Cefepime is inactive against most strains of Clostridium difficile.

 

Susceptibility Tests

 

Dilution Techniques

Quantitative methods are used to determine antimicrobial minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs). These MICs provide estimates of the susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial compounds. The MICs should be determined using a standardized procedure. Standardized procedures are based on a dilution method1 (broth or agar) or equivalent with standardized inoculum concentrations and standardized concentrations of cefepime powder. The MIC values should be interpreted according to the following criteria:

Table 4
  MIC (µg/mL)
Microorganism Susceptible (S) Intermediate (I) Resistant (R)
*NOTE: Isolates from these species should be tested for susceptibility using specialized dilution testing methods.1 Also, strains of Haemophilus spp. with MICs greater than 2 µg/mL should be considered equivocal and should be further eva luated.
Microorganisms other than
Haemophilus spp.* and
S. pneumoniae*
≤8 16 ≥32
Haemophilus spp.* ≤2 —* —*
Streptococcus pneumoniae* ≤0.5 1 ≥2

A report of “Susceptible” indicates that the pathogen is likely to be inhibited if the antimicrobial compound in the blood reaches the concentrations usually achievable. A report of “Intermediate” indicates that the result should be considered equivocal, and, if the microorganism is not fully susceptible to alternative, clinically feasible drugs, the test should be repeated. This category implies possible clinical applicability in body sites where the drug is physiologically concentrated or in situations where high dosage of drug can be used. This category also provides a buffer zone which prevents small uncontrolled technical factors from causing major discrepancies in interpretation. A report of “Resistant” indicates that the pathogen is not likely to be inhibited if the antimicrobial compound in the blood reaches the concentrations usually achievable; other therapy should be selected.

Standardized susceptibility test procedures require the use of laboratory control microorganisms to control the technical aspects of the laboratory procedures. Laboratory control microorganisms are specific strains of microbiological assay organisms with intrinsic biological properties relating to resistance mechanisms and their genetic expression within bacteria; the specific strains are not clinically significant in their current microbiological status. Standard cefepime powder should provide the following MIC values (Table 5) when tested against the designated quality control strains:

Table 5
Microorganism ATCC MIC (µg/mL)
Escherichia coli 25922 0.016-0.12
Staphylococcus aureus 29213 1-4
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 27853 1-4
Haemophilus influenzae 49247 0.5-2
Streptococcus pneumoniae 49619 0.06-0.25

 

Diffusion Techniques

Quantitative methods that require measurement of zone diameters also provide reproducible estimates of the susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial compounds. One such standardized procedure2 requires the use of standardized inoculum concentrations. This procedure uses paper disks impregnated with 30 µg of cefepime to test the susceptibility of microorganisms to cefepime. Interpretation is identical to that stated above for results using dilution techniques.

Reports from the laboratory providing results of the standard single-disk susceptibility test with a 30-µg cefepime disk should be interpreted according to the following criteria:

Table 6
  Zone Diameter (mm)
Microorganism Susceptible (S) Intermediate (I) Resistant (R)
*NOTE: Isolates from these species should be tested for susceptibility using specialized diffusion testing methods2. Isolates of Haemophilus spp. with zones smaller than 26 mm should be considered equivocal and should be further eva luated. Isolates of S. pneumoniae should be tested against a 1-µg oxacillin disk; isolates with oxacillin zone sizes larger than or equal to 20 mm may be considered susceptible to cefepime.
Microorganisms other than
Haemophilus spp.* and
S. pneumoniae*
≥18 15-17 ≤14
Haemophilus spp.* ≥26 —* —*

As with standardized dilution techniques, diffusion methods require the use of laboratory control microorganisms to control the technical aspects of the laboratory procedures. Laboratory control microorganisms are specific strains of microbiological assay organisms with intrinsic biological properties relating to resistance mechanisms and their genetic expression within bacteria; the specific strains are not clinically significant in their current microbiological status. For the diffusion technique, the 30-µg cefepime disk should provide the following zone diameters in these laboratory test quality control strains (Table 7):

Table 7
Microorganism ATCC Zone Size Range (mm)
Escherichia coli 25922 29-35
Staphylococcus aureus 25923 23-29
Pseudomonas aeruginosa 27853 24-30
Haemophilus influenzae 49247 25-31

 

INDICATIONS AND USAGE

MAXIPIME is indicated in the treatment of the following infections caused by susceptible strains of the designated microorganisms (see also PRECAUTIONS: Pediatric Use and DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION):



 

Pneumonia (moderate to severe) caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae, including cases associated with concurrent bacteremia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, or Enterobacter species.

 

Empiric Therapy for Febrile Neutropenic Patients. Cefepime as monotherapy is indicated for empiric treatment of febrile neutropenic patients. In patients at high risk for severe infection (including patients with a history of recent bone marrow transplantation, with hypotension at presentation, with an underlying hematologic malignancy, or with severe or prolonged neutropenia), antimicrobial monotherapy may not be appropriate. Insufficient data exist to support the efficacy of cefepime monotherapy in such patients. (See CLINICAL STUDIES.)

 

Uncomplicated and Complicated Urinary Tract Infections (including pyelonephritis) caused by Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae, when the infection is severe, or caused by Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, or Proteus mirabilis, when the infection is mild to moderate, including cases associated with concurrent bacteremia with these microorganisms.

 

Uncomplicated Skin and Skin Structure Infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin-susceptible strains only) or Streptococcus pyogenes.

Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections (used in combination with metronidazole) caused by Escherichia coli, viridans group streptococci, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter species, or Bacteroides fragilis. (See CLINICAL STUDIES.)

 

To reduce the development of drug-resistant bacteria and maintain the effectiveness of MAXIPIME and other antibacterial drugs, MAXIPIME should be used only to treat or prevent infections that are proven or strongly suspected to be caused by susceptible bacteria. When culture and susceptibility information are available, they should be considered in selecting or modifying antibacterial therapy. In the absence of such data, local epidemiology and susceptibility patterns may contribute to the empiric selection of therapy.

 

CLINICAL STUDIES

 

Febrile Neutropenic Patients

The safety and efficacy of empiric cefepime monotherapy of febrile neutropenic patients have been assessed in two multicenter, randomized trials, comparing cefepime monotherapy (at a dose of 2 g IV q8h) to ceftazidime monotherapy (at a dose of 2 g IV q8h). These studies comprised 317 eva luable patients. Table 8 describes the characteristics of the eva luable patient population.

Table 8: Demographics Of eva luable Patients (First Episodes Only)
  Cefepime Ceftazidime
Total 164 153
ANC = absolute neutrophil count; SBP = systolic blood pressure
Median age (yr) 56.0 (range, 18-82) 55.0 (range, 16-84)
Male 86 (52%) 85 (56%)
Female 78 (48%) 68 (44%)
Leukemia 65 (40%) 52 (34%)
Other hematologic malignancies 43 (26%) 36 (24%)
Solid tumor 54 (33%) 56 (37%)
Median ANC nadir (cells/µL) 20.0 (range, 0-500) 20.0 (range, 0-500)
Median duration of neutropenia (days) 6.0 (range, 0-39) 6.0 (range, 0-32)
Indwelling venous catheter 97 (59%) 86 (56%)
Prophylactic antibiotics 62 (38%) 64 (42%)
Bone marrow graft 9 (5%) 7 (5%)
SBP <90 mm Hg at entry 7 (4%) 2 (1%)

Table 9 describes the clinical response rates observed. For all outcome measures, cefepime was therapeutically equivalent to ceftazidime.

Table 9: Pooled Response Rates for Empiric Therapy of Febrile Neutropenic Patients
  % Response
Outcome Measures Cefepime
(n=164)
Ceftazidime
(n=153)
Primary episode resolved with no treatment modification, no new febrile episodes or infection, and oral antibiotics allowed for completion of treatment 51 55
Primary episode resolved with no treatment modification, no new febrile episodes or infection and no post-treatment oral antibiotics 34 39
Survival, any treatment modification allowed 93 97
Primary episode resolved with no treatment modification and oral antibiotics allowed for completion of treatment 62 67
Primary episode resolved with no treatment modification and no post-treatment oral antibiotics 46 51

Insufficient data exist to support the efficacy of cefepime monotherapy in patients at high risk for severe infection (including patients with a history of recent bone marrow transplantation, with hypotension at presentation, with an underlying hematologic malignancy, or with severe or prolonged neutropenia). No data are available in patients with septic shock.

 

Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections

Patients hospitalized with complicated intra-abdominal infections participated in a randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial comparing the combination of cefepime (2 g q12h) plus intravenous metronidazole (500 mg q6h) versus imipenem/cilastatin (500 mg q6h) for a maximum duration of 14 days of therapy. The study was designed to demonstrate equivalence of the two therapies. The primary analyses were conducted on the protocol-valid population, which consisted of those with a surgically confirmed complicated infection, at least one pathogen isolated pretreatment, at least 5 days of treatment, and a 4-6 week follow-up assessment for cured patients. Subjects in the imipenem/cilastatin arm had higher APACHE II scores at baseline. The treatment groups were otherwise generally comparable with regard to their pretreatment characteristics. The overall clinical cure rate among the protocol-valid patients was 81% (51 cured/63 eva luable patients) in the cefepime plus metronidazole group and 66% (62/94) in the imipenem/cilastatin group. The observed differences in efficacy may have been due to a greater proportion of patients with high APACHE II scores in the imipenem/cilastatin group.

 

CONTRAINDICATIONS

<
以下是“全球医药”详细资料
Tags: 责任编辑:admin
】【打印繁体】【投稿】【收藏】 【推荐】【举报】【评论】 【关闭】 【返回顶部
分享到QQ空间
分享到: 
上一篇MAXIPIME(Cefepime Hydrochloride.. 下一篇Cubicin(daptomycin for injectio..

相关栏目

最新文章

图片主题

热门文章

推荐文章

相关文章

广告位