Pharmacotherapeutic group: Anticholinergics
ATC code: R03B B04
Tiotropium bromide is a long-acting, specific antagonist at muscarinic receptors. It has similar affinity to the subtypes, M1 to M5. In the airways, tiotropium bromide competitively and reversibly binds to the M3 receptors in the bronchial smooth musculature, antagonising the cholinergic (bronchoconstrictive) effects of acetylcholine, resulting in bronchial smooth muscle relaxation. The effect was dose dependent and lasted longer than 24h. As an N-quaternary anticholinergic, tiotropium bromide is topically (broncho-) selective when administered by inhalation, demonstrating an acceptable therapeutic range before systemic anticholinergic effects may occur.
The dissociation of tiotropium from especially M3-receptors is very slow, exhibiting a significantly longer dissociation half-life than ipratropium. Dissociation from M2-receptors is faster than from M3, which in functional in vitro studies, elicited (kinetically controlled) receptor subtype selectivity of M3 over M2. The high potency, very slow receptor dissociation and topical inhaled selectivity found its clinical correlate in significant and long-acting bronchodilation in patients with COPD.
The clinical Phase III development programme included two 1-year, two 12-weeks and two 4-weeks randomised, double-blind studies in 2901 COPD patients (1038 receiving the 5 µg tiotropium dose). The 1-year programme consisted of two placebo-controlled trials. The two 12-week trials were both active (ipratropium) - and placebo-controlled. All six studies included lung function measurements. In addition, the two 1-year studies included health outcome measures of dyspnoea, health-related quality of life and effect on exacerbations.
In the aforementioned studies, tiotropium solution for inhalation, administered once daily, provided significant improvement in lung function (forced expiratory volume in one second and forced vital capacity) within 30 minutes following the first dose, compared to placebo (FEV1 mean improvement at 30 minutes: 0.113 litres; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.102 to 0.125 litres, p< 0.0001). Improvement of lung function was maintained for 24 hours at steady state compared to placebo (FEV1 mean improvement: 0.122 litres; 95% CI: 0.106 to 0.138 litres, p< 0.0001).
Pharmacodynamic steady state was reached within one week.
Spiriva Respimat significantly improved morning and evening PEFR (peak expiratory flow rate) as measured by patient's daily recordings compared to placebo (PEFR mean improvement: mean improvement in the morning 22 L/min; 95% CI: 18 to 55 L/min, p< 0.0001; evening 26 L/min; 95% CI: 23 to 30 L/min, p<0.0001). The use of Spiriva Respimat resulted in a reduction of rescue bronchodilator use compared to placebo (mean reduction in rescue use 0.66 occasions per day, 95% CI: 0.51 to 0.81 occasions per day, p<0.0001).
The bronchodilator effects of Spiriva Respimat were maintained throughout the 1-year period of administration with no evidence of tolerance.
The following health outcome effects were demonstrated in the long term 1-year studies:
(a) Spiriva Respimat significantly improved dyspnoea (as eva luated using the Transition Dyspnoea Index) compared to placebo (mean improvement 1.05 units; 95% CI: 0.73 to 1.38 units, p<0.0001). An improvement was maintained throughout the treatment period.
(b) The improvement in mean total score of patient's eva luation of their Quality of Life (as measured using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire) between Spiriva Respimat versus placebo at the end of the two 1-year studies was 3.5 units (95% CI: 2.1 to 4.9, p<0.0001). A 4-unit decrease is considered clinically relevant.
(c) COPD Exacerbations
In three one-year, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials Spiriva Respimat treatment resulted in a significantly reduced risk of a COPD exacerbation in comparison to placebo. Exacerbations of COPD were defined as “a complex of at least two respiratory events/symptoms with a duration of three days or more requiring a change in treatment (prescription of antibiotics and/or systemic corticosteroids and/or a significant change of the prescribed respiratory medication)”. Spiriva Respimat treatment resulted in a reduced risk of a hospitalisation due to a COPD exacerbation (significant in the appropriately powered large exacerbation trial).
The pooled analysis of two Phase III trials and separate analysis of an additional exacerbation trial is displayed in Table 1. All respiratory medications except anticholinergics and long-acting beta-agonists were allowed as concomitant treatment, i.e. rapidly acting beta-agonists, inhaled corticosteroids and xanthines. Long-acting beta-agonists were allowed in addition in the exacerbation trial.
Table 1: Statistical Analysis of Exacerbations of COPD and Hospitalized COPD Exacerbations in Patients with Moderate to Very Severe COPD
Study
(NSpiriva, Nplacebo)
|
Endpoint
|
Spiriva Respimat
|
Placebo
|
% Risk Reduction
(95% CI)a
|
p-value
|
1-year Ph III studies, pooled analysisd
(670, 653)
|
Days to first COPD exacerbation
|
160a
|
86a
|
29
(16 to 40)b
|
<0.0001b
|
Mean exacerbation incidence rate per patient year
|
0.78c
|
1.00c
|
22
(8 to 33)c
|
0.002c
|
Time to first hospitalised COPD exacerbation
|
|
|
25
(-16 to 51)b
|
0.20b
|
Mean hospitalised exacerbation incidence rate per patient year
|
0.09 c
|
0.11 c
|
20
(-4 to 38) c
|
0.096 c
|
1-year Ph IIIb exacerbation study
(1939, 1953)
|
Days to first COPD exacerbation
|
169a
|
119a
|
31
(23 to 37)b
|
<0.0001b
|
Mean exacerbation incidence rate per patient year
|
0.69c
|
0.87c
|
21
(13 to 28)c
|
<0.0001c
|
Time to first hospitalised COPD exacerbation
|
|
|
27
(10 to 41)b
|
0.003b
|
Mean hospitalised exacerbation incidence rate per patient year
|
0.12c
|
0.15c
|
19
(7 to 30)c
|
0.004c
|
a Time to first event: days on treatment by when 25% of patients had at least one exacerbation of COPD / hospitalized COPD exacerbation. In study A 25% of placebo patients had an exacerbation by day 112, whereas for Spiriva Respimat 25% had an exacerbation by day 173 ( p=0.09);in study B 25% of placebo patients had an exacerbation by day 74, whereas for Spiriva Respimat 25% had an exacerbation by day 149 (p<0.0001).
b Hazard ratios were estimated from a Cox proportional hazard model. The percentage risk reduction is 100(1 - hazard ratio).
c Poisson regression. Risk reduction is 100(1 - rate ratio).
d Pooling was specified when the studies were designed. The exacerbation endpoints were significantly improved in individual analyses of the two one year studies.
In a retrospective pooled analysis of the three 1-year and one 6-month placebo-controlled trials with Spiriva Respimat including 6,096 patients a numerical increase in all-cause mortality was seen in patients treated with Spiriva Respimat (68; incidence rate (IR) 2.64 cases per 100 patient-years) compared with placebo (51, IR 1.98) showing a rate ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.33 (0.93, 1.92) for the planned treatment period; the excess in mortality was observed in patients with known rhythm disorders.
|