|  
            
            TOP 
            
           | 
        
         
          |  
             INCIVEK(telaprevir)tablet, film coated(二十七) 
            
            
            
               
                | 
                  
                  ubstitutions (includes mixtures)
									
										†
									
										Subjects with this combination are also encompassed in two V36M and R155K rows above.
								
							 | 
						 
					
					
						
							| 
								Any substitution at V36, T54, R155, A156 or D168 | 
							
								62% (323) | 
							
								69% (247) | 
							
								45% (76) | 
						 
						
							| 
								R155K/T | 
							
								38% (201) | 
							
								56% (200) | 
							
								0.6% (1) | 
						 
						
							| 
								V36M | 
							
								33% (178) | 
							
								49% (173) | 
							
								3% (5) | 
						 
						
							| 
								V36M + R155K† | 
							
								27% (142) | 
							
								40% (142) | 
							
								0% (0) | 
						 
						
							| 
								T54A/S | 
							
								13% (68) | 
							
								9% (31) | 
							
								22% (37) | 
						 
						
							| 
								V36A/L | 
							
								12% (65) | 
							
								10% (37) | 
							
								17% (28) | 
						 
						
							| 
								A156S/T | 
							
								9% (48) | 
							
								8% (28) | 
							
								12% (20) | 
						 
						
							| 
								V36G/I, I132V, R155G/M, A156V/F/N or D168N | 
							
								Less than 2% | 
							
								Less than 2% | 
							
								Less than 2% | 
						 
					
					
						
						
						
						
					
				 
			
			
				
					Persistence of Resistance-Associated Substitutions 
				
					Persistence of telaprevir-resistant NS3 amino acid substitutions has been observed following treatment failure. Of a combined 255 treatment-naïve and previously treated subjects from Studies 108, 111, and C216 in whom telaprevir-resistant variants had emerged during treatment, 103 (40%) had detectable resistant variants by population sequencing at end of study (follow-up range 2-70 weeks, median 45 weeks) and results for loss of variants were similar across the three studies. In the combined studies, 46% of the telaprevir-resistant substitutions in subtype 1a and 16% of the substitutions in subtype 1b were still detected by the end of study: 29% of V36, 16% of T54, 38% of R155, 14% of A156, and 44% of V36M+R155K variants were detected at the end of study. 
				
					In a 3-year follow-up study of 56 treatment-naïve and prior treatment-failure subjects who did not achieve SVR with a telaprevir regimen in a Phase 2 study and had telaprevir-resistant variants after treatment failure, variants were detected by population sequencing in 11% (6/56) of subjects (median follow-up of 25 months). Telaprevir-resistant variants V36L/M, T54S, and R155K were detectable (present at greater than 25% of the viral population) in some subjects at 24 months. By 36 months, V36M, T54A/S, and A156N/S/T variants had fallen below the level of detection by population sequencing in all subjects. At 36 months, 3% of the subject isolates that had the R155K variant still had detectable R155K variants by population sequencing. 
				
					The lack of detection of a substitution based on a population-based assay does not necessarily indicate the substitution has declined to the pre-treatment level. The long-term clinical impact of the emergence or persistence of detectable INCIVEK resistance-associated substitutions is unknown. No data are available regarding INCIVEK efficacy among patients w   |