TOP
|
Fulyzaq Tablets(六)
|
Lopinavir/Ritonavir
|
30 (22)
|
21 (39)
|
15 (33)
|
40 (29)
|
Efavirenz/Tenofovir/ Emtricitabine
|
30 (22)
|
7 (13)
|
7 (15)
|
21 (15)
|
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
|
18 (13)
|
8 (15)
|
5 (11)
|
14 (10)
|
Atazanavir sulfate
|
19 (14)
|
3 (6)
|
6 (13)
|
22 (16)
|
Abacavir w/ lamivudine
|
17 (13)
|
5 (9)
|
5 (11)
|
18 (13)
|
Darunavir
|
19 (14)
|
4 (7)
|
4 (9)
|
14 (10)
|
Raltegravir
|
16 (12)
|
4 (7)
|
5 (11)
|
11 (8)
|
Valaciclovir hydrochloride
|
12 (9)
|
8 (15)
|
5 (11)
|
16 (12)
|
Fosamprenavir
|
12 (9)
|
6 (11)
|
4 (9)
|
13 (9)
|
Zidovudine w/ lamivudine
|
12 (9)
|
3 (6)
|
3 (7)
|
15 (11)
|
Lamivudine
|
7 (5)
|
6 (11)
|
4 (9)
|
6 (4)
|
Nevirapine
|
8 (6)
|
6 (11)
|
3 (7)
|
9 (7)
|
Atazanavir
|
5 (4)
|
6 (11)
|
2 (4)
|
2 (1)
|
Abbreviations: ART = antiretroviral therapy; PI = Protease Inhibitor; BID = twice daily.
The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with a clinical response, defined as less than or equal to 2 watery bowel movements per week during at least 2 of the 4 weeks of the placebo-controlled phase. Patients who received concomitant ADMs or opiates were counted as clinical non-responders.
A significantly larger proportion of patients in the crofelemer 125 mg twice daily group experienced clinical response compared with patients in the placebo group (17.6% vs. 8.0%, 1‑sided p < 0.01).
In the randomized clinical study, examination of duration of diarrhea, baseline number of daily watery bowel movements, use of protease inhibitors, CD4 cell count and age subgroups did not identify differences in the consistency of the crofelemer treatment effect among these subgroups. There were too few female subjects and subjects with an HIV viral load > 400 copies/mL to adequately assess differences in effects in these populat |