re male. 88.4% were White, 7.1% Black or African American. 17.2% were Hispanic. 9.6% of patients had eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73m2. The mean BMI was approximately 31.1 kg/m2.
At week 52, the difference in HbA1c reduction from baseline between TRESIBA and insulin glargine U-100 was 0.09% with a 95% confidence interval of [-0.04%; 0.22%] and met the pre-specified non-inferiority margin (0.4%); See Table 8.
Table 8: Results at Week 52 in a Trial Comparing TRESIBA to Insulin glargine U-100 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on OAD(s)*
TRESIBA + OAD(s)*
Insulin glargine U-100 + OAD(s)*
N
773
257
HbA1c (%)
Baseline
8.2
8.2
End of trial
7.1
7.0
Adjusted mean change from baseline**
-1.06
-1.15
Estimated treatment difference [95%CI]
TRESIBA - Insulin glargine U-100
0.09 [-0.04;0.22]
Proportion Achieving HbA1c < 7% at Trial End
51.7%
54.1%
FPG (mg/dL)
Baseline
174
174
End of trial
106
115
Adjusted mean change from baseline
-68.0
-60.2
Daily insulin dose
Baseline mean (starting dose)
10 U
10 U
Mean dose after 52 weeks
56 U
58 U
*OAD: oral antidiabetic agent
**The change from baseline to end of treatment visit in HbA1c was analysed using ANOVA with treatment, region, sex, and anti-diabetic treatment at screening as fixed effects, and age and baseline HbA1c as covariates.
In Study D, there were 20.6% of subjects in the TRESIBA and 22.2% Insulin glargine arms for whom data was missing at the time of the HbA1c measurement.
Study E: TRESIBA U-200 Administered at the Same Time each Day as an Add-on to Metformin with or without a DPP-4 inhibitor in Insulin Naïve Patients
The efficacy of TRESIBA U-200 was eva luated in a 26-week randomized, open-label, multicenter trial in 457 insulin naïve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on one or more oral antidiabetic agents (OADs) at baseline. Patients were randomized to TRESIBA U-200 once-daily with the evening meal or insulin glargine U-100 once-daily according to the approved labeling. Both treatment arms were receiving metformin alone (84%) or in combination with a DPP-4 inhibitor (16%) as background therapy.
The mean age of the trial population was 57.5 years and mean duration of diabetes was 8.2 years. 53.2% were male. 78.3% were White, 13.8% Black or African American. 7.9% were Hispanic. 7.5% of patients had eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m2. The mean BMI was approximately 32.4 kg/m2.
At week 26, the difference in HbA1c reduction from baseline between TRESIBA U-200 and insulin glargine U-100 was 0.04% with a 95% confidence interval of [-0.11%; 0.19%] and met the pre-specified non-inferiority margin (0.4%). See Table 9.
Table 9: Results at Week 26 in a Trial Comparing TRESIBA U-200 to Insulin glargine U-100 in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on OAD(s)*
TRESIBA U-200 + Met ± DPP-4
Insulin glargine U-100 + Met ± DPP-4
N
228
229
HbA1c (%)
Baseline
8.3
8.2
End of trial
7.0
6.9
&nb