设为首页 加入收藏

TOP

Gemzar® (gemcitabine HCl)(七)
2013-08-09 11:47:54 来源: 作者: 【 】 浏览:15184次 评论:0
astatic pancreatic cancer. The first trial compared Gemzar to 5–Fluorouracil (5–FU) in patients who had received no prior chemotherapy. A second trial studied the use of Gemzar in pancreatic cancer patients previously treated with 5–FU or a 5–FU–containing regimen. In both studies, the first cycle of Gemzar was administered intravenously at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 over 30 minutes once weekly for up to 7 weeks (or until toxicity necessitated holding a dose) followed by a week of rest from treatment with Gemzar. Subsequent cycles consisted of injections once weekly for 3 consecutive weeks out of every 4 weeks.
The primary efficacy parameter in these studies was “clinical benefit response,” which is a measure of clinical improvement based on analgesic consumption, pain intensity, performance status, and weight change. Definitions for improvement in these variables were formulated prospectively during the design of the 2 trials. A patient was considered a clinical benefit responder if either:
the patient showed a ≥50% reduction in pain intensity (Memorial Pain Assessment Card) or analgesic consumption, or a 20–point or greater improvement in performance status (Karnofsky Performance Status) for a period of at least 4 consecutive weeks, without showing any sustained worsening in any of the other parameters. Sustained worsening was defined as 4 consecutive weeks with either any increase in pain intensity or analgesic consumption or a 20–point decrease in performance status occurring during the first 12 weeks of therapy.
OR:
the patient was stable on all of the aforementioned parameters, and showed a marked, sustained weight gain (≥7% increase maintained for ≥4 weeks) not due to fluid accumulation.
The first study was a multicenter (17 sites in US and Canada), prospective, single–blinded, two–arm, randomized, comparison of Gemzar and 5–FU in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer who had received no prior treatment with chemotherapy. 5–FU was administered intravenously at a weekly dose of 600 mg/m2 for 30 minutes. The results from this randomized trial are shown in Table 6. Patients treated with Gemzar had statistically significant increases in clinical benefit response, survival, and time to disease progression compared to 5–FU. The Kaplan–Meier curve for survival is shown in Figure 4. No confirmed objective tumor responses were observed with either treatment.
Table 6: Gemzar Versus 5–FU in Pancreatic Cancer *
Karnofsky Performance Status.
N=number of patients.
The p-value for clinical benefit response was calculated using the two-sided test for difference in binomial proportions. All other p-values were calculated using the Log rank test for difference in overall time to an event.
Kaplan-Meier estimates.
No progression at last visit; remains alive. 
 Gemzar
 5–FU
  Number of patients
 63
 63
 
     Male
 34
 34
 
 
     Female
 29
 29
 
 
  Median age
 62 years
 61 years
 
     Range
 37 to 79
 36 to 77
 
  Stage IV disease
 71.4%
 76.2%
 
  Baseline KPS*≤70
 69.8%
以下是“全球医药”详细资料
Tags: 责任编辑:admin
首页 上一页 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 下一页 尾页 7/28/28
】【打印繁体】【投稿】【收藏】 【推荐】【举报】【评论】 【关闭】 【返回顶部
分享到QQ空间
分享到: 
上一篇Etopophos 下一篇Avastin (bevacizumab)

相关栏目

最新文章

图片主题

热门文章

推荐文章

相关文章

广告位