;NEXIUM 40 mg
75.9%
94.1%
p < 0.001
656
NEXIUM 20 mg
70.5%
89.9%
p < 0.05
650
Omeprazole 20 mg
64.7%
86.9%
3
576
NEXIUM 40 mg
71.5%
92.2%
N.S.†
572
Omeprazole 20 mg
68.6%
89.8%
4
1216
NEXIUM 40 mg
81.7%
93.7%
p < 0.001
1209
Omeprazole 20 mg
68.7%
84.2%
log-rank test vs. omeprazole 20 mg
†
N.S. = not significant (p > 0.05)
Study
No. of Patients
Treatment Groups
Week 4
Week 8
Significance Level *
1
588
NEXIUM 20 mg
68.7%
90.6%
N.S.†
588
Omeprazole 20 mg
69.5%
88.3%
2
654
NEXIUM 40 mg
75.9%
94.1%
p < 0.001
656
NEXIUM 20 mg
70.5%
89.9%
p < 0.05
650
Omeprazole 20 mg
64.7%
86.9%
3
576
NEXIUM 40 mg
71.5%
92.2%
N.S.†
572
Omeprazole 20 mg
68.6%
89.8%
4
1216
NEXIUM 40 mg
81.7%
93.7%
p < 0.001
1209
Omeprazole 20 mg
68.7%
84.2%
In these same studies of patients with erosive esophagitis, sustained heartburn resolution and time to sustained heartburn resolution were eva luated and are shown in the table below:
Table 11
Sustained Resolution* of Heartburn (Erosive Esophagitis Patients) *
Defined as 7 consecutive days with no heartburn reported in daily patient diary.
†
Defined as the cumulative proportion of patients who have reached the start of sustained resolution
‡
log-rank test vs omeprazole 20 mg
§
N.S. = not significant (p > 0.05)
Cumulative Percent† with Sustained Resolution
Study
No. of Patients
Treatment Groups
Day 14
Day 28
Significance Level ‡
1
573
NEXIUM 20 mg
64.3%
72.7%
N.S.§
555
Omeprazole 20 mg
64.1%
70.9%
2
621
NEXIUM 40 mg
64.8%
74.2%
p <0.001
620
NEXIUM 20 mg
62.9%
70.1%
N.S.§
626
Omeprazole 20 mg
56.5%
66.6%
3
568
NEXIUM 40 mg
65.4%
73.9%
N.S.§
551
Omeprazole 20 mg
65.5%
73.1%
4
1187
NEXIUM 40 mg
67.6%
75.1%
p <0.001
1188
Omeprazole 20 mg
62.5%
70.8%
Defined as 7 consecutive days with no heartburn reported in daily patient diary.
†
D